We asked, you told us: You think the US has gone too far against Huawei


Huawei P40 Pro Plus 6

Huawei is dealing with US commerce restrictions which are harder than ever, to the purpose the place even non-American firms like LG and Samsung are halting shipments to China’s tech large. The corporate has warned that it gained’t have high-end Kirin processors in its telephones for the foreseeable future.

These measures are supposed to forestall Huawei from utilizing its mobile networking gear and smartphones to spy on US pursuits. However is the crackdown warranted? And whether it is, did the US go too far? We requested to your ideas.

Has the US gone too far towards Huawei?


We revealed our ballot on September 10, with 3,564 of you chiming in. And the outcomes are clear: most of you imagine the US went too far towards Huawei, with 67.6% of readers contending that the ban was both too strict or shouldn’t have been in place in any respect. That left simply 32.4% of you agreeing with the restrictions.

This doesn’t come as an entire shock. Whereas the US authorities has been adamant that Huawei poses a safety danger because of the opportunity of receiving surveillance requests from the Chinese language Communist Social gathering, there’s been a definite lack of public proof to indicate this has occurred. It wouldn’t be stunning if you happen to stay unconvinced that Huawei is a risk.

This might have an effect in your cellphone decisions. The ban successfully blocks US gross sales of Huawei telephones just like the P40 Professional and prevents them from utilizing sure processors or Google apps. Smartphone competitors is worse off within the present local weather.

Your feedback

  • Atty Halmágyi: I imagine that is too far. Huawei is an excellent model, and now it appears even South Korea helps [the] USA to destroy them. I do know Huawei has made errors, however to kill an organization due to that is kinda harsh. [The] USA might give them a second probability as they did to ZTE.
  • Terry Trott: China’s authoritarian dictatorship must be challenged each step of their method. The free world must be as one, in rejection of [China’s] views of how the world ought to be.
  • Eoga: Didn’t these firms pay already for any software program or {hardware} they’re utilizing to create their merchandise to allow them to promote them to whoever they need? How is {that a} overseas authorities can inform them to who[m] they will and may’t promote their merchandise? i believe each nation ought to simply do the identical and inform their native firms to… not promote something to People to cease this sort of conduct. In any other case they may very well be subsequent, solely as a result of the American authorities needs to.
  • Norman William NG: Silly and infantile transfer. Huawei, Xiaomi, and different Chinese language Model contribute loads of new smartphone customers (nonetheless studying) as it’s extra economical and inexpensive. It’s going to open loads of new doorways of alternative to greater finish person[s of brands] like Samsung, HTC, and so forth., as people won’t ever be glad with only a mere economical and inexpensive [device].
  • Lamar Taylor: Billion greenback firms preventing and having beef sounds good for headlines, however I don’t need to take sides right here. If LG and Samsung don’t need to promote screens to Huawei, then that’s their enterprise.
  • ANTHONYinCALI: I get banning Huawei within the US, I’m completely positive with that. Personally I might care much less what they do exterior of the US, although.

Thanks for voting in our ballot and leaving all of your feedback! What do you consider the ballot and its outcomes? Please provide your ideas within the remark part under.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here