We Don’t Need a Little House on the Prairie Reboot

Netflix announced this week that it’s traveling back to Walnut Grove by ordering a reboot of my favorite childhood series. I’m dumbfounded.

Little House on the Prairie, the beloved 1970s drama starring Michael Landon and Melissa Gilbert, should stay nostalgic and beloved.

Not every old television show needs to be modernized, even if it has recently experienced a resurgence in streaming.

Netflix ordered the series shortly after Nielson reported that viewers watched 13.25 billion minutes of Little House on the Prairie on Peacock over the past year. That is impressive.

CBS Studios is producing the new Little House. Rebecca Sonnenshine (The Boys) is the showrunner, and Trip Friendly of Friendly Family Productions is also an executive producer.

They’ll do another reimagining of Laura Ingalls Wilder’s book series. The official logline reads as follows:

“Part hopeful family drama, part epic survival tale, and part origin story of the American West, this fresh adaptation of Laura Ingalls Wilder’s iconic semi-autobiographical ‘Little House’ books offers a kaleidoscopic view of the struggles and triumphs of those who shaped the frontier.”

That’s what worries me. Netflix excels at book-to-screen adaptations, but reimagining a classic in modern times could wreck it.

Little House Would Suffer with Modern and Woke Undertones

Little House would suffer from trying to incorporate modern themes of sexuality and gender norms into the 1870s and 1880s when dating and courting were so different.

Netflix already failed at this when they adapted another beloved classic, Anne of Green Gables, into the modernized Anne with an E.

Many of us grew up on the novels and the Canadian mini-series starring Megan Follows that followed the books religiously with charm.

• The Greatest Sports Docuseries to Binge for Fans of Action and Drama
  by Lisa Babick
• Quirky, Awkward, and Unforgettable: TV’s Most Lovable Misfits
  by Lisa Babick
• Short Stints, Big Impacts: 17 TV Characters Who Made Every Second Count
  by Lisa Babick

Anne with An E made a large arc about Diana’s Aunt Josephine being a lesbian, which often felt like it was talking to the audience more than about the characters.

I’d hate to see them do the same thing to Little House. I’m not against LGBTQ characters, but it needs to make sense. While Little House on the Prairie was about coming-of-age and finding yourself, it mainly dealt with family and community stories.

That was part of its charm, which is why I loved Little House on the Prairie so much. Sometimes, simplicity is best.

Keeping Things Historic Needs to Be Balanced with New Book Controversary

Things have changed so much since the 1970s that even following the source material could be complicated.

While many of us loved how Wilder’s boos captured frontier life and the series expanded on that, nowadays, there has been controversy, especially with how Indians were portrayed.

We know race is a hot topic, and the Indians were a massive part of the Ingalls experience in Kansas, as depicted in the pilot movie.

While Native Americans appeared in other episodes, that was the pivotal episode, and they would need to be cautious about how to portray it.

Is it worth all the trouble dealing with new laws and controversies when we can re-watch the original anytime we want?

Could Trip Friendly Create a New Beloved Little House?

The only bright side is that Trip Friendly is one of the executive producers. He’s Ed Friendly’s son, and Ed was the original creator and producer of the beloved 1970s series.

Friendly Family Productions bought the television rights to the books in the 1970s, and It still owns the rights to Laura’s life until she is 16.

• Jessica Knight and Alden Parker: The Romance That Could Change NCIS Forever
  by Lisa Babick
• Charlie’s Angels: The Show That Empowered Women and Changed TV Forever
  by Lisa Babick
• When TV Got Too Weird: The Shows That Pushed Boundaries and Paid the Price
  by Lisa Babick

Even in the 1970s, there was drama on television sets as Ed Friendly and leading man Michael Landon disagreed on running the show.

Friendly wanted the television series to be based on the book series, while Michael Landon thought that for the series to thrive, the characters and plots needed to be fleshed out more.

Ultimately, NBC believed in Landon’s vision, and the TV series became different from the books, except for specific episodes.

 After Season 4, Little House on the Prairie was almost unrecognizable from the books when the Ingalls started adopting additional children.

 It added romantic interests for Mary and Nellie. While Mary went to a college for the blind in the books, she never married, and Nellie wasn’t a large part of the books.

Some of these moments were charming scenes, so it’s hard to imagine the TV series without them. Trip Friendly is excited about honoring his father’s legacy.

“It has been a long-held dream of mine to carry on my father’s legacy and adapt Wilder’s classic American stories for a 21st-century audience in a way that brings together fans of both the books and the original television series,” said Friendly in a statement.

Since he’s so familiar with the material, he might be the ideal candidate to honor Wilder’s work. In fact, he’s already created a documentary about her life, with Dean Butler (former Almonzo Wilder) narrating the piece.

While I’m not thrilled with it, I’m relieved he’s involved. It would be even better if some of the old cast made cameo appearances.

How are you feeling about a new version of Little House on the Prairie? Should this be one that was left alone?

Since we’re getting one, who’s part of your dream cast?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.

Watch Little House on the Prairie Online

The post We Don’t Need a Little House on the Prairie Reboot appeared first on TV Fanatic.

Source: TV Fanatic